All over, England lost by ten wickets early in the third session on day two. Were India the better team? Obviously. Was the pitch fit for test cricket? Definitely not. Did Bairstow fail after missing a straight one?
Did England pick the wrong XI? Definitely. Would India have won on a better pitch in a match that lasted 4 ½ days? Probably. What are the odds on the next pitch (on the same ground) giving little chance of a result?
Would I have settled for England having a chance (?) of tying the series going into the final match? Yes actually.